Ladue Schools Propostion 1 Results - Two Weeks Later
I just received an e-mail from a fellow school parent who wanted to show my results numbers to some other folks, and that made me want to see if the St. Louis Board of Elections had updated their result numbers from two weeks ago. They did, but the numbers are not fully complete yet. I wanted to see the township breakdown for the Ladue School District Proposition 1 voting results and they have most of the votes tabulated by township, but not all of them. The results so far are pretty interesting, though.
Since the election ended it looks like they have collected a few hundred more votes since the polls closed, so now the overall total is 4754 Yes, 4255 No, still a 500 vote decision. But if you break it down by township numbers you again see how the votes vary from location to location:
So if you look at the results you will notice that the township data is still missing 1,020 Yes votes and 477 No votes which would actually make the results 3,778 No and 3,734 Yes if those were the complete numbers. So those missing 1,497 votes are very important and are 68% Yes votes. If you compare the 2010 township votes (where the township totals do add up to the final total) the Missouri River township has more than twice the total votes compared to what is listed currently online, so I am guessing a lot of the missing votes are from that township. If we take the current percentages and assuming that they are fairly close to the final ones we can see that the proposition definitely passed fairly strongly in the Creve Couer township and that it failed with a strong No majority in the Clayton township. From the small sampling in the Missouri River township it does not seem to be passing there either, but in 2010 that was the township that was more "in the middle" of the voting preferences of the other two. I will be very curious to see where the other missing 1,500 votes are located, but I am guessing at least 1,000 of them are in the Missouri River township to bring them closer to a 50%/50% split. With the current township votes the winning gap of Yes votes in the Creve Coeur township is almost fully negated by the No majority in Clayton township.
Since the election ended it looks like they have collected a few hundred more votes since the polls closed, so now the overall total is 4754 Yes, 4255 No, still a 500 vote decision. But if you break it down by township numbers you again see how the votes vary from location to location:
TOWNSHIP | Yes | No | % Yes | Diff |
Clayton | 1375 | 1840 | 42.77% | -465 |
Creve Coeur | 2013 | 1472 | 57.76% | 541 |
Missouri River | 346 | 466 | 42.61% | -120 |
*Missing | 1020 | 477 | 68.14% | 543 |
TOTAL | 4754 | 4255 | 52.77% | 499 |
So if you look at the results you will notice that the township data is still missing 1,020 Yes votes and 477 No votes which would actually make the results 3,778 No and 3,734 Yes if those were the complete numbers. So those missing 1,497 votes are very important and are 68% Yes votes. If you compare the 2010 township votes (where the township totals do add up to the final total) the Missouri River township has more than twice the total votes compared to what is listed currently online, so I am guessing a lot of the missing votes are from that township. If we take the current percentages and assuming that they are fairly close to the final ones we can see that the proposition definitely passed fairly strongly in the Creve Couer township and that it failed with a strong No majority in the Clayton township. From the small sampling in the Missouri River township it does not seem to be passing there either, but in 2010 that was the township that was more "in the middle" of the voting preferences of the other two. I will be very curious to see where the other missing 1,500 votes are located, but I am guessing at least 1,000 of them are in the Missouri River township to bring them closer to a 50%/50% split. With the current township votes the winning gap of Yes votes in the Creve Coeur township is almost fully negated by the No majority in Clayton township.
Comments